本赛季珀尔特尔缺席，猛龙在内线场均净负对手8.1分（珀尔特尔本季缺阵，猛龙内线每场净落后对手8.1分）

Analyzing Raptors' Performance

I need to respond to the Chinese sentence about the Raptors being outscored by 8.1 points per game in the paint when Poeltl is absent. The user might be looking for a tweet or some analysis. Since it's a statement and not a question, I’ll provide a quick analysis about their interior defense and rebounding issues without him, as well as its impact on their scheme. I should also keep the current date in mind and consider my knowledge limitations.Interpreting Defensive Impact

I realize we're not asked to verify the statement but can provide insightful interpretations. We could discuss aspects like rim protection, defensive rebounding, and opponent field goal percentage at the rim. Since the Raptors' roster is uncertain for 2024-25, it's best not to speculate on specifics. Instead, I'll focus on the broader impact of Poeltl's absence, such as decreased interior defense and screening efficiency. I could suggest strategies like playing more zone or packing the paint without getting into roster specifics.Crafting Analytical Response

I can present 3-5 bullet points about what the stat suggests, potential causes, and what to watch like opponent rim field goal percentage and defensive rebounding. I’ll keep it neutral and also ask if the user wants me to rewrite this as a tweet or do more detailed data verification in Chinese. I should calculate what the "net -8.1 in the paint" means for losing paint points and provide context about league averages. Instead of making strong claims, I’ll state that “above eight points typically indicates a significant gap.” I’ll suggest checking stats like shot frequency and screen assists to validate.Offering Coaching Suggestions

I’m providing quick coaching suggestions based on the data about the Raptors. Here’s a succinct response:

• This data shows that without Poeltl, the Raptors' rim protection and defensive rebounding have clearly declined.
• Possible reasons include decreased rim deterrence leading to more effective attacks by opponents; lower defensive rebounding rates; increased fouls leading to free throws; and a lack of offensive threats.
• Key indicators to watch: opponent shooting percentage in the paint, rebounding rates, second-chance points allowed, team foul rates, and On/Off data.
• Potential adjustments: implement more drop coverage, tighten weak side, increase zone defense, and utilize bigger lineups.

I’ll ask if they need a rewrite, verification, or a chart version.